One subject, in depth · bridged to Sideline US
FightIndex
2010s MMA · most active 2010s

Jasminka Cive

70″ reach · +6.09% reach advantage · 90th percentile

MMA record

5–2

Jasminka Cive has a reach of 70″ against a height of 66″ — a reach advantage of +6.09%, exceptional for 2010s MMA and the 90th percentile of the 653 compared here.

2010win v Aniko Levi, 2010, kowin v Olga Denisenko, 2010, submissionwin v Lilla Vincze, 2011, kowin v Eva Henesova, 2012, koloss v Bec Rawlings, 2013, submissionloss v Karolina Kowalkiewicz, 2014, submission
WON ABOVE·LOST BELOW BAR = STOPPAGE·BROKEN BAR = SUBMISSION·TICK = DECISION 2010–2014

SOURCE·Jasminka Cive — English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)·derived figures computed here·REVIEWED 2025-10-31

How this record is compiled

  1. Measurements come from the fighter's English Wikipedia infobox; the bout list is parsed from the results table on the same article, read on 2025-10-31. Boxing tables are read by header name and MMA records by the fixed column order of the MMA record template — two different parsers, because reading MMA rows as a boxing table returns a fighter's boxing record in place of their real one.
  2. A bout enters the ledger with whatever fields the source states: result, opponent, method, round, year. Any field the source leaves empty stays empty here. A date that cannot be established is left blank rather than inferred, and the bout is still counted.
  3. A no contest is counted and printed as a no contest. It is never folded into the wins, the losses or the draws, and it never disappears to make a total balance.
  4. Where the article's infobox total disagrees with its own results table, both figures are published and each is labelled with where it came from. Nothing is averaged and nothing is reconciled against a second database.
  5. Percentiles rank this fighter among the 653 2010s MMA fighters in the dataset — the most specific group of at least 30 that this fighter belongs to.
reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100

Sources, exclusions and known limits →

Bout record

Every bout the article's own results table lists, in order. A dash is a field the source leaves empty — it is not a zero and it is not a guess.

Bout-by-bout recordAUG 2026
YearResultOpponentMethodRd
2014 L Karolina Kowalkiewicz Submission1
2013 L Bec Rawlings Submission1
2012 W Eva Henesova KO/TKO3
2011 W Lilla Vincze KO/TKO2
2010 W Aniko Levi KO/TKO2
2010 W Olga Denisenko Submission1

2 of these opponents have their own page here.

SOURCE·Jasminka Cive — English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)·derived figures computed here·REVIEWED 2025-10-31

Reach in context

Reach advantage

+6.09%

70″ reach on a 66″ frame

Compared against 653 2010s MMA fighters — no weight class is on record for Jasminka Cive, so the comparison is by era. Median 2.75%.

-3.2%2010s MMA reach advantage12.9%
Measurements
Reach70″ (177.8 cm)28th pct
Height66″ (167.6 cm)15th pct
StanceSouthpaw
DivisionStrawweight MMA
Most active decade2010s — 6 of 6 dated bouts
CountryAustria

Record

MMA record

5–2

7 bouts on record

Finish rate

100%

of wins ended inside the distance — strawweight MMA median 54%, 92nd percentile

KO/TKO: 4 (80%)Submission: 1 (20%)
  • KO/TKO 80%
  • Submission 20%

The career, bout by bout

6 recorded bouts from 2010 to 2014. Every incumbent shows this as a table you have to read; here it is as a shape you can see.

2010 win vs Aniko Levi (2010)win vs Olga Denisenko (2010)win vs Lilla Vincze (2011)win vs Eva Henesova (2012)loss vs Bec Rawlings (2013)loss vs Karolina Kowalkiewicz (2014)
winlossdraw / NC2010–2014

Career span

5y

2010–2014

Longest unbeaten run

4

without a loss — draws do not break it

Busiest year

2010

2 bouts

Recorded bouts

6

6 with a date

Standing questions

What this record does and does not say

What is Jasminka Cive's record?
5–2 in MMA. That is the aggregate stated in the English Wikipedia infobox; the results table on the same article lists 6 bouts individually.
Does a no contest change a record here?
No. A no contest is not a win, a loss or a draw, and it is never folded into one. It is counted and printed separately, so a 20–0 record with two no contests is shown as exactly that rather than as 22–0 or as 20–0 with the no contests dropped. The same applies to a bout overturned after the fact where the source records the change.
What happens when sources disagree about a fight?
This site publishes one source — the fighter's English Wikipedia article, read on the date printed under every table — and it does not silently reconcile that against anyone else's database. Where the article's own infobox total and its own results table disagree, both are shown and the page says which one each figure came from. Nothing is averaged, and no field is filled in from a second source to make a total balance.

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.