Jake Hager
81″ reach · +6.58% reach advantage · 87th percentile
3–0
Jake Hager has a reach of 81″ against a height of 76″ — a reach advantage of +6.58%, long for heavyweight MMA and the 87th percentile of the 140 compared here.
SOURCE·Jake Hager — English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)·derived figures computed here·REVIEWED 2026-07-26
How this record is compiled
- Measurements come from the fighter's English Wikipedia infobox; the bout list is parsed from the results table on the same article, read on 2026-07-26. Boxing tables are read by header name and MMA records by the fixed column order of the
MMA recordtemplate — two different parsers, because reading MMA rows as a boxing table returns a fighter's boxing record in place of their real one. - A bout enters the ledger with whatever fields the source states: result, opponent, method, round, year. Any field the source leaves empty stays empty here. A date that cannot be established is left blank rather than inferred, and the bout is still counted.
- A no contest is counted and printed as a no contest. It is never folded into the wins, the losses or the draws, and it never disappears to make a total balance.
- Where the article's infobox total disagrees with its own results table, both figures are published and each is labelled with where it came from. Nothing is averaged and nothing is reconciled against a second database.
- Percentiles rank this fighter among the 140 heavyweight MMA fighters in the dataset — the most specific group of at least 30 that this fighter belongs to.
reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100
Bout record
Every bout the article's own results table lists, in order. A dash is a field the source leaves empty — it is not a zero and it is not a guess.
| Year | Result | Opponent | Method | Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | W | Brandon Calton | Decision | 3 |
| 2019 | N | Anthony Garrett | — | 1 |
| 2019 | W | T.J. Jones | Submission | 1 |
| 2019 | W | J.W. Kiser | Submission | 1 |
SOURCE·Jake Hager — English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)·derived figures computed here·REVIEWED 2026-07-26
Reach in context
Reach advantage
+6.58%
81″ reach on a 76″ frame
Compared against 140 heavyweight MMA fighters. Median 3.22%.
| Reach | 81″ (205.7 cm) | 85th pct |
|---|---|---|
| Height | 76″ (193 cm) | 68th pct |
| Stance | — | |
| Division | Heavyweight MMA | |
| Most active decade | 2010s — 3 of 4 dated bouts | |
| Country | United States |
Record
MMA record
3–0
3 bouts on record
Finish rate
67%
of wins ended inside the distance — heavyweight MMA median 85%, 19th percentile
The career, bout by bout
4 recorded bouts from 2019 to 2020. Every incumbent shows this as a table you have to read; here it is as a shape you can see.
Career span
2y
2019–2020
Longest unbeaten run
3
without a loss — draws do not break it
Busiest year
2019
3 bouts
Recorded bouts
4
4 with a date
Closest in build
heavyweight MMA fighters with the nearest reach advantage.
- Soa Palelei+6.58% 81″ reach · 87th pct
- Ben Rothwell+6.58% 81″ reach · 87th pct
- Cheick Kongo+6.58% 81″ reach · 87th pct
- Matt Skelton+6.67% 80″ reach · 90th pct
- Bob Sapp+6.49% 82″ reach · 86th pct
- Juan Espino+6.67% 80″ reach · 90th pct
- Johnny Walker+6.49% 82″ reach · 86th pct
- Ovince Saint Preux+6.67% 80″ reach · 90th pct
What this record does and does not say
- What is Jake Hager's record?
- 3–0 in MMA. That is the aggregate stated in the English Wikipedia infobox; the results table on the same article lists 4 bouts individually.
- Does a no contest change a record here?
- No. A no contest is not a win, a loss or a draw, and it is never folded into one. It is counted and printed separately, so a 20–0 record with two no contests is shown as exactly that rather than as 22–0 or as 20–0 with the no contests dropped. The same applies to a bout overturned after the fact where the source records the change.
- What happens when sources disagree about a fight?
- This site publishes one source — the fighter's English Wikipedia article, read on the date printed under every table — and it does not silently reconcile that against anyone else's database. Where the article's own infobox total and its own results table disagree, both are shown and the page says which one each figure came from. Nothing is averaged, and no field is filled in from a second source to make a total balance.
